I have just put my review on the Craven Arms, Birmingham and scrolled down to read the previous ones, and was shocked to read a bad review dated March 2013 that had nothing to do with the pub as it is now, but would give a totally wrong impression to anyone reading it. The reviewer did have an up to date review dated the same day, so it would appear that the old one had been written some time earlier but just posted now, or transferred from a previous site.
I find this worrying, and know that some on here don't post the reviews straight away, but if it is not current, could the reviewer not put the date as part of the review so that a reader knows when it was done.