Ads not shown when logged in
-
Most people are normally intrigued at having their picture taken outside a pub and will present an obscenity to ruin your picture. Sure they are happy to be posted on the internet having gone to the effort of raising a finger or two or shaking a wrist repeatedly.
The previous post I think is rubbish, how do you make factual tv program without the general public being in the way. Do you watch day time tv or any tv? Most police based tv programs have people saying you can't film me with police saying anyone can film on the street.
Got bugger all to do with this thread though but spurious link imho.
Last edited by bcfczuluarmy; 16-09-2018 at 22:07.
-
Originally Posted by
bcfczuluarmy
Most people are normally intrigued at having their picture taken outside a pub and will present an obscenity to ruin your picture. Sure they are happy to be posted on the internet having gone to the effort of raising a finger or two or shaking a wrist repeatedly.
When I was a teenager I took a photo with a telephoto lens of a vagrant woman sitting on a park bench in Hyde Park (it was supposed to be a socially conscious artistic study). She spotted me and promptly raised her upper garment to flash her knockers at me. I ran away in sheer terror!
Re pictures of pubs, I try and wait until people have passed by. In the unlikely event that any people in a picture saw them here, presumably they could contact the site and ask for them to be removed. It wouldn't bother me if they did that with one of my pics.
-
That's for factual TV to decide. And anyway, iplayer notwithstanding, factual TV is lot more evaporative than a static web site. News programmes dissapear after a week or so.
I quite like Pubs Galore, and, whether the law is rubbish or not, or you have a different interpretation of it than m'learned friends, it's best to stay on the right side of it by obeying one or two simple guidelines for the publication of pictures. All it takes someone to cause a fuss about a pic of him enjoying a convivial evening with his boss's wife and to to dump a load of legal fees on the site and that's the end of that.
-
I find moving cars more of an annoyance, people I'll wait for to move but smokers get in the way. Not sure how long I'd have to wait for knockers, probably longer than drinking the pint I've took the picture of said pub.
Or just go to Blackpool maybe?
Last edited by bcfczuluarmy; 16-09-2018 at 22:15.
-
Originally Posted by
NickDavies
If you are going to take a picture of someone for publication you must obtain consent.[/url]
If I accidentally get someone in the picture, I usually either crop them out or pixellate their features. In cases where this has not been done and anyone complains about their picture being on the site, surely deleting the picture is sufficient to deflect any possible legal ramifications? Presumably there are thousands of photos on this site where people are depicted without their permission - how many complaints have there been so far?
Come On You Hatters!
-
Originally Posted by
bcfczuluarmy
I find moving cars more of an annoyance
It's cars parking right in front of the pub, just as I'm about to press the shutter, that really get my goat.
Come On You Hatters!
-
Originally Posted by
NickDavies
Absolutely correct see the official document here, however page 3 says get permission or if that is impractical (as it usually will be for us) blur the faces.
-
Originally Posted by
NickDavies
I think that permission rather relates to something more akin to a portrait photo. The exemptions listed make mention of consent not being required where a person is in a location or at an event where they may expect to appear in a photo; many selfies/group photos are taken in a pub where bystanders will inevitably be included. And look at the paparazzi - if these rules could be enforced, they'd be out of business. The other exemption relates to a person and context which could cause harm to their reputation, e.g. a photo which shows a CAMRA member drinking Fosters in The Wenlock.
-
Originally Posted by
oldboots
Absolutely correct see the official document
here, however page 3 says get permission or if that is impractical (as it usually will be for us) blur the faces.
That document comes from Malta!
-
GDPR and Photography
Last edited by rpadam; 17-09-2018 at 20:29.
Similar Threads
-
By Komakino in forum That Doesn't Go There!
Replies: 1
Last Post: 31-07-2017, 12:18
-
By Blog Tracker in forum Blog Tracker
Replies: 0
Last Post: 24-06-2015, 09:27
-
By an_ecumenical_matter in forum That Doesn't Go There!
Replies: 1
Last Post: 04-11-2011, 09:02
-
By RogerB in forum That Doesn't Go There!
Replies: 2
Last Post: 23-04-2011, 09:57
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules