Ads not shown when logged in
-
Automated Tracker
Shut up about Barclay Perkins - Let's Brew Wednesday - 1956 Shepherd Neame Abbey Ale
Visit the Shut up about Barclay Perkins site
AA – what the hell does that mean? That’s what I thought when I first stumbled across this beer in Shepherd Neame’s records. Luckily, I’ve analyses for a beer of theirs called Abbey Ale. And label images.
It must have been introduced around 1953, a typical time for stronger beers to be introduced. I say that because it isn’t in their 1952 brewing book, but is in the 1956 one.
This is a difficult beer to categorise. In my gravity spreadsheet, I’ve classified it as a Pale Ale. Based mostly on its colour, which is pretty pale at around 10 EBC / 5 SRM. Which you’ll note is much paler than the calculated colour in the recipe below. That will be on account of the gyling. In reality, the proportion of No. 3 invert sugar would have been lower.
OK back to the drawing board. That’s clearly come out wrong. Abbey Ale contained very little of the second wort – only 4 of the 98 barrels. Assuming all the No. 3 went in the second copper, that drastically reduces the percentage of the sugar in Abbey Ale. From 25% to 9%.
As I was saying, a difficult one to categorise, this one. I’ve got it down as a Strong Ale in my brewing log spreadsheet. That was mainly because it was parti-gyled with a couple of Brown Ales. I’d assumed that it was darker than it was. I think I’ll standardise on Pale Ale. Though it is weird that it wasn’t parti-gyled with the Pale Ales.
Ah. I think I know why it wasn’t parti-gyled with the Bitters. Abbey Ale was a bottled beer, as were all the beers it was parti-gyled with. That probably explains it. And also the presence of wheat malt. For head retention, is my guess. Something more important in a bottled beer.
Not much else to say, other than that the attenuation isn’t great. I was going to say tank conditioning before bottling would have lowered that a bit. But having looked at the two analyses of Abbey Ale I have, I’m not so sure. The one from 1954 is, indeed, more highly attenuated at 76%. That from 1961, however, is only 67% attenuated.
1956 Shepherd Neame Abbey Ale |
pale malt |
7.75 lb |
85.45% |
wheat malt |
0.50 lb |
5.51% |
no. 3 sugar |
0.75 lb |
8.27% |
malt extract |
0.07 lb |
0.77% |
Fuggles 105 mins |
1.00 oz |
|
Goldings 60 mins |
0.50 oz |
|
Goldings 30 mins |
0.50 oz |
|
OG |
1044.3 |
|
FG |
1016.9 |
|
ABV |
3.62 |
|
Apparent attenuation |
61.85% |
|
IBU |
27 |
|
SRM |
8 |
|
Mash at |
153º F |
|
Sparge at |
170º F |
|
Boil time |
105 minutes |
|
pitching temp |
60.25º F |
|
Yeast |
a Southern English Ale yeast |
|
More...
Similar Threads
-
By Blog Tracker in forum Blog Tracker
Replies: 0
Last Post: 29-10-2016, 07:08
-
By Blog Tracker in forum Blog Tracker
Replies: 0
Last Post: 20-10-2016, 07:35
-
By Blog Tracker in forum Blog Tracker
Replies: 0
Last Post: 19-10-2016, 07:10
-
By Blog Tracker in forum Blog Tracker
Replies: 0
Last Post: 28-09-2016, 07:10
-
By Blog Tracker in forum Blog Tracker
Replies: 0
Last Post: 21-09-2016, 07:05
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules