It's been a few months since Dave spread the load and let a few of us approve photos, this has certainly made a difference to the speed they are approved at but other than that how do we feel about how well it is working?
Personally I have applied the general rules that picture quality or pictures very like another existing shot aren't something to worry about and just approve them, that internal or garden shots should be "don't show on main page", and that we don't need umpteen pictures of shops that used to be pubs or buildings on the site of a pub - one will do. Any shots that are obviously a duplication by the person submitting I "refer to admin" (as with the "more old shops" pictures and duplicate photos of new buildings on the site of a pub). Needless to say anything with questionable content would be "referred" although I haven't seen anything like that yet.
I'm not asking for strict guidelines here, just an idea whither the system is working or if contributors feel their photo's are being unfairly left off.