Unique pub visits

[Rex_Rattus]

I do much the same as Strongers. If a pub has had a major refurbishment, or there's a significant change since my previous visit, then I will post a new review. I used to edit/add to my previous review, with a statement something like "the following from Apr 2010", but now I tend to post a new review as I think it makes the timeline of comments a bit clearer. However, I accept that there is also merit in editing postings as it then displays all the information at a current date, at the top of the pile as it were. I don't think that there is a right or wrong way of doing it.

[Maldenman]

I would tend to write a new review if needed especially as sometimes reviewers comment on other reviews, "as X says below etc" which of course then makes no sense at all if the review is relocated.

[Millay]

I tend to new reviews rather than update old ones. Even if nothing much has changed, if there hasn't been a review for say 2 years, I usually add a few lines just so that people know the pub is still open and as previously described.