http://www.morningadvertiser.co.uk/n.../article/87956
north:notworthy:
Printable View
http://www.morningadvertiser.co.uk/n.../article/87956
north:notworthy:
Neither. If all there is is GKIPA I'll have lager or Guinness. Or go somewhere else.
"...discerning Greene King IPA drinkers..."
?
I'm not sure why this is suddenly hot news. The North/South contraption has been in operation for 3 or 4 years, first with the St Edmunds Ale and with the IPA.
I would only drink it if there wasn't any other choice but would go for the North, simply because I get South down here all the time anyway. I wonder what a half North and half South mixture would be like?:confused:
It was Champion Bitter at the GBBF a few years back, a fact GK are keen we don't forget. CAMRA seem less keen - this year's programme lists various previous winners but not GKIPA, perhaps desparate to avoid a repeat of the sh*tstorm that occurred at the time.
After the big debate regarding some ales brewed for sparkler (mainly North) and some not (mainly South), I'd be most interested to try, say, a Landlord & a Harveys both with, then without, to form a judgement.
I'd be happy for anyone to suggest beers more suitable for this control experiment, but not one from greedyk.
On my recent visit to York I had beers with and without sparklers, and in my view they tasted better without them - and I do mean the taste, not just the consistency. It's just a matter of prersonal taste, of course.
The Bell and Crown by Kew Bridge has sparklers and it is a Fullers house. The Pride tastes completely different, but not in a detrimental way. It's a good pub, but alas I think that the inclusion of sparklers is financially driven - forshame.
I used to be very anti-sparkler but have come round to it in under the priciple "when in Rome..."
But if I come across a sparklerised London Pride south of Birmingham I will still have words!!!