There is now a map showing the remaining 4000 or so pubs without a photo https://www.pubsgalore.co.uk/pubs-without-photos/
Printable View
There is now a map showing the remaining 4000 or so pubs without a photo https://www.pubsgalore.co.uk/pubs-without-photos/
Wowser! Where's the emoji for "squeals of photographer joy"?
That looks really good and definitely something I could use once we're allowed to do non-essential journeys again.
A thought: I've noticed a few pubs with photos that were uploaded by "anonymous user" some time in 2004. As far as I can recall, these are all in a smaller format and include such things as pencil drawings, watercolours and postcards. (Maybe I'm exaggerating.) Is there any way of defining "pictureless pubs" as those with nothing since the date of these picture uploads? It's quite possible that there are only a few left that have not been superseded by more up-to-date photos, so if it looks like being a big change, just say no.
Looking good Dave.
Any chance of a similar feature for unreviewed pubs? :cheers:
Just moved this into a new thread to make sure more people see it.
I've been meaning to do a map of this for ages because I know I'd find it useful, have a trip planned for West Cornwall in May so thought it'd be a good opportunity to get a few photos, turns out there aren't many around there to get https://www.pubsgalore.co.uk/pubs-wi...49902343751,11 (notice you can share a URL with the co-ordinates at the end)
Also, good idea with the 2004 photos, they are added into it now so number has gone up by about 130.
Certainly can, the trouble comes with loading all 16000 in one go. My computer and phone can just about handle it, but it causes a bit of a strain https://www.pubsgalore.co.uk/pubs-without-reviews/
I am keen to make more use of mapping in general, so ideas for useful visualisations are welcome.
Absolutely excellent feature and will help enormously - great job! Marginally annoying in that some of the places I have planned for this year have no photo gaps at all, but I suppose that is generally good news.
Great map, should be able to add a few soon.
Yes. I've noticed some by 'anonymous user' and several I requested to be deleted as they showed the wrong pub.
Good idea. Though some places aren't worth reviewing - restaurants where a Peroni can be had without food, for example, which shouldn't have been added to the db, IMHO.
What a great feature. I have spotted a couple not far from me which i should have done by now but it has been a strange 12 months. I'll get right on it !!!
Just found one to add albeit in lockdown state from April 2020.
I will do at some point, I need to take stock of all the little bits that I've added to the site without putting a link up. I did add a link to it from this page about a week ago https://www.pubsgalore.co.uk/stats/photos-counties.php
I was browsing the map and found a pub in a tiny Cornish village that I know I've been to, I'm sure I have a photo somewhere.
Knocked another three off the list today, the 4th planned one today will have to wait a couple of weeks due to scaffolding. :moremad:
Just scaffolding? I wouldn't let that stop you.
It wouldn't stop one of our Scottish contributors if it was scaffolded, boarded up (just for lockdown) and in darkness, at midnight, during a blackout.:evilgrin:
Then he complains that some of his photos don't get accepted.
He then deletes them and resubmits the exact same crap again. :moremad:
Smugglers Inn Has 2 pictures awaiting approval. Also does the The Rockpool. Have these not been approved as taken from a bus in Scotland? How many others out of the list have pictures awaiting approval?
Both are now approved (the Smugglers Inn earlier when I spotted the map point correction and then checked the pub entry) and The Rockpool now.
However, due to some earlier change that I am either unaware of or have forgotten, there are some historic John McGraw photographs that escaped approval when originally submitted and which are now only found by chance.
Photos by John McGraw and Graham Mason are not visible on the 7 dwarfs approval list due to the sheer volume that were being submitted at the time.
Dave has/did have some sort of process that does a mass approval.
I assume that these were missed due to a glitch.
Dave, if you now allowed the dwarfs to see any photos submitted by these 2 contributors, would any old missing ones suddenly appear on our to do list?
Well that's already prompted me to knock one more off, restoring Surrey to 100% and getting my first review of the year in (albeit an update of a 'holding' one). There could be hope for 2021 yet!
The Prince Alfred has one but it's of the pub's in-house mouse, with glowing eyes.
Dave, I am loving those two maps - fantastic work! :notworthy:
I have lots of pub and pub sign photos but I am not clear on how you add them to the pages on here, Arthur Chappell
There should an 'Upload (Drag & Drop Files)' box visible on each pub page.
NB - If possible, pictures should be recent, showing how the pub currently looks from the road. Older pictures can be uploaded too, but these will usually be suppressed from showing on the main pub page (although they will still be visible on the 'Pub Pictures' page for people interested in the history as well as interior details, etc.)
Still a few showing as not having pics: The Oak for example.
Thanks, Dave. I missed this announcement somehow - hope you didn't think I was ungrateful for the prompt response to my suggestion! (Same day, too - very impressive.)
Yes, that's the idea! Any pubs with *only* a photo or other picture that was uploaded in July 2004 will show as photoless until someone takes and uploads a new one. The one you mention has got quite a decent photo, but lots of them are just drawings or images from place mats - the photo of The Oak is just small format, but there are others that don't do either the pub or this site any favours.
Another pub on the map as photoless but with a reasonable picture, albeit 2004, it looks the same as it did when I reviewed it in 2016. Shame I failed to take a photo at the time.
Yes, didn't Dave say there are 130 of them? They're not errors - they're there because I asked Dave to put them there! The thing they have in common is that they are small format and can't be enlarged. I still think it's a good idea to encourage photographers to seek them out and do a more up-to-date photograph, in terms of size and definition as much as to record the building again, but it's not compulsory!
So get yourself back there, then. :)
None that I had found. Because when I encountered one (and not for a long time), I requested a dwarf delete it. At the time I thought that 'Anonymous User' was some kink of hoaxer. Only now because of your mention of Dave's and Conrad's 'site transformation' mentioned above did all become clear. But if there are some pubs with just the one photo and it's wrong, then it may be worth checking if in the area so that a correct photo can be taken.
I created the first version of the site in early 2003, at that stage anyone could submit a photo without needing to log in. I wasn't storing them in good quality or the date they were submitted. Conrad then wrote a new version of the site that we released in July 2004, we kept all the old photos and just set the date as the day of the release. Since then lots of the old photos (around 100 were mine) have been deleted.