PDA

View Full Version : Shut up about Barclay Perkins - Tetley cask Bitter specifications (part seven)



Blog Tracker
10-03-2023, 07:58
Visit the Shut up about Barclay Perkins site (http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2023/03/tetley-cask-bitter-specifications-part_01614312706.html)


https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZa-wB8GR6_Bf7SzpKKbxTN108-BSCk4nJO8Djq03jK5IXe--CQipFJ3SSxV1m3DT-lHsLzrp38SjjLcQDC62hKyhN6Ex2iFND_yYwe_6kp0r4aYpWSu a3I0k-EQ_lHfvOo8-kt2jZvaIQIUQA5VfFuBf1puoXYk_4b15bMoRrkmwpwBl2mn3w9 PRX/w300-h400/Tetley_cask_conditioned.jpeg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZa-wB8GR6_Bf7SzpKKbxTN108-BSCk4nJO8Djq03jK5IXe--CQipFJ3SSxV1m3DT-lHsLzrp38SjjLcQDC62hKyhN6Ex2iFND_yYwe_6kp0r4aYpWSu a3I0k-EQ_lHfvOo8-kt2jZvaIQIUQA5VfFuBf1puoXYk_4b15bMoRrkmwpwBl2mn3w9 PRX/s465/Tetley_cask_conditioned.jpeg)
If all has gone well, I should be on plane jetting back to Europe. Do I feel guilty about all my air travel? No. Because I've never owned a car. Other than flights, all my travel is my electric-proered vehicles. Or on foot.We've got to the end of the Tetley's Bitter specification. And a few surprises have been left until now.
Obviously enough, the last phase of the process was post fermentation. Where there was still lots of interesting stuff going on. I don't want to spoil things too much by getting ahead of myself. But there were a surprising number of differences between the handling of cask Bitter and cask Mild. For no obvious reason. We'll see all of this in my next series of posts. Bet you can't wait for that.
One of the drums I keep beating like a deranged football fan is the influence of tax systems on beer. We'll be seeing a very good example of the crap brewers were encouraged to do by the particular way UK excise duty on beer was collected.
After that tease, here's the first table of fun.



16. ADDITIONS POST-FERMENTATION


Material
Rate
Type
Where Added


Priming
NONE




Acid
NONE




Hop Pellets
2 Pellets (1 oz per Brl)
North Down
In Cask


PFB
25%
Isohopcon
Racking Tank


Colour
As required reboil after 48 hours
Caramel AB (1045°)
Racking Tank


Finings
4pt/Brl
Penang Leaf
Cask


Sterilised Beer
7.5% Max
1031°
Racking Tank


Preservative
As S02 (ppm)
NaMs




468 1 pt Brl
NaMs
Colour C.V.



155 1/3 pt/Brl
(working Soln)
Sterilised Beer


Protesal
None




Lucilite
None




Polyclar At.
None




Source:


Tetley Beer and Malt Specifications, 1985, beer page 5.


I'll start with a big surprise right at the start of the table. Tetley Bitter wasn't primed. Which is odd for a low-gravity Bitter of this type, which was supposed to come into condition quickly. Which means they were relying on residual sugars in the beer for conditioning in the cask.
The figure on the first page described as "Limit Atten," Is presumably the lowest the gravity the beer should attain after cask conditioning. The value is given as 1003.5º. Which would leave the apparent attenuation at 90% and the ABV 4.2%. Which is a good bit stronger than I would have expected.
I'm not surprised that it was dry hopped. The quantity is fairly small, but it is a pretty low-gravity Bitter. Handy that the hop variety is listed: North Down.

What PFB stands for might be a puzzle, I do know what Isohopcon was. A hop extract manufactured by Pauls & Whites Ltd of Reigate. As we saw early, this provided 25% of the bitterness. It's interesting how late this was added. Only in the racking tank.
The caramel was added at the same stage. Interesting that the OG of the caramel is listed, but not its colour. I suppose that it didn't really matter as only a sufficient quantity was used to hit the colour standard.
Nothing exceptional about the finings, which you would expect to be added to the casks.
Next we see the effect of taxing beer based on what was in the fermenter before fermentation. Because sterilised beer is a posh way of saying ullage. This is presumably retumed beer which has been sterilised to stop it infecting the fresh beer. At least Tetley limited the amount to 7.5% maximum. Watney was merrily using 15% and more, depending on the beer.

Why did brewers use returned beer? Because it was tax-free. When beer was returned to the brewery as unsaleable, the excise duty on it was refunded. If a brewery reused it, there was no tax on it. When the system was changed in the 1990s to be based on the ABV of the beer when it left the brewery, that advantage disappeared. Tax was due on everything leaving the brewery, including any ullage which had been mixed in.
I was slightly surprised to see preservative added. Though some was added to the sterilised beer which does make sense.
One final table.




7. DRAUGHT BEER RACKING


a) Temperature (°F) (°C)
55 +-3 (12. 8)


b) Yeast Count (10>6 cells/ML)
0.5 +- 0.4


c) Dry Hop i) Rate
2 Pellets per brl. 1 oz/brl


ii) Type
North Down.


d) Fining (pt/brl)
4


e) Storage Time (Brewery)
3 days


(Depot)
14 days max.


f) RT residence time
6-48 hours


Source:


Tetley Beer and Malt Specifications, 1985, beer page 5.


This is mostly a repeat of earlier information. You can see that the casks were given a reasonable amount of time to condition: 3 days in the brewery and up to two weeks at the depot.

Why would it sit for up to two days in the racking tank? I'm guessing that was so they could blend together different batches.
Next up is cask Mild.



More... (http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2023/03/tetley-cask-bitter-specifications-part_01614312706.html)