PDA

View Full Version : Shut up about Barclay Perkins - Post-war legislation and the brewer



Blog Tracker
26-06-2020, 07:20
Visit the Shut up about Barclay Perkins site (http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2020/06/post-war-legislation-and-brewer.html)


https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-w4DKN7so_B0/XvRuzJmaZ6I/AAAAAAAAiD0/GMV3Sh2V8Q4x1zzUml20sv9w1ygTofSewCLcBGAsYHQ/s400/Hancock_Special_Stout.jpg (https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-w4DKN7so_B0/XvRuzJmaZ6I/AAAAAAAAiD0/GMV3Sh2V8Q4x1zzUml20sv9w1ygTofSewCLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/Hancock_Special_Stout.jpg)
Brewers faced many challenges post-war. Some caused by the war itself, others of a more bureaucratic nature.

The late 1940s, like the war years were one of extreme government control. Pubs - and through them the brewers who owned them - were affected by multiple pieces of legislation.

One referred to post-war reconstruction:


"There are two items that I mention as causing some anxiety and they are the Licensing Planning Temporary Provisions Act, and the Town and Country Planning Act. The former usually applies to places that have been very badly damaged during the War, such as Swansea in this area. The position has been met by formation of a Committee of Licensed Property Owners (of which I happen to be the Chairman) which has prepared its proposals for the re-distribution of licensed houses, consequent on the re-planning of the town, and the more equitable distribution of licences into the new housing estates that are now in process of erection. This Committee has appeared before the Licensing Planning Committee, and is now in process of negotiation and confident that before long an agreement will be reached on plans that will be generally satisfactory. It is necessary to take a long term view of the matter, which may involve some sacrifice, but in the end there should be some compensation by the fact that old and unsatisfactory houses will be replaced by newer and better houses. "
Western Mail - Friday 17 September 1948, page 1.Getting hold of licences in new housing estates was a key objective of brewers post-war. They were large, modern pubs with little, or no, immediate competition. And about a brewers only change of either building a new pub. Which is why they were happy to trade in two or three inner-city licences in return.

By "more equitable distribution" they mean making sure that every brewery got its fair share of the new licences. This is more from the chairman's speech at William Hancock's annual general meeting. I'm pretty sure Hancock was the largest brewery in South Wales, hence its chairman landing the top job in the Committee of Licensed Property Owners'

Surprisingly, in 1948 there were more pubs than in 1939:



Pubs in England and Wales 1939 - 1948


Date
Full
Beer / wine
Total Pubs


1939
56,112
17,460
73,572


1940
56,047
17,318
73,365


1941
55,961
17,249
73,210


1942
55,901
17,191
73,092


1943
55,868
17,137
73,005


1944
55,856
17,109
72,965


1945
55,875
17,085
72,960


1946
56,009
17,017
73,026


1947
56,305
16,927
73,232


1948
58,850
16,534
75,384


Source:


Brewers' Almanack 1971, page 83.



I'm amazed that only a couple of hundred pubs closed during the war, given the number that were either destroyed outright or so heavily damaged as to be unusable.


https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-coQ8QKSIILo/XvRu7RmzHKI/AAAAAAAAiD4/YRAiWCX8p7s8nevfuvQrj9Cpv_ZnFcV1wCLcBGAsYHQ/s320/z_Hancock%2B10a.JPG (https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-coQ8QKSIILo/XvRu7RmzHKI/AAAAAAAAiD4/YRAiWCX8p7s8nevfuvQrj9Cpv_ZnFcV1wCLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/z_Hancock%2B10a.JPG)
There was another advantage to building a totally new pub as opposed to enlarging an existing one:


"As to the Town and Country Planning Act. Under this Act no alterations or improvements of more than 10 per cent. of the existing area of the property can be allowed without payment of development charge. That may tend to retard improvements to licensed houses which would otherwise have bean put in hand, but in the case of an entirely new licensed house in a new district that is not the subject of a planning removal it is reasonable to suppose that the development charge will be merged into a charge for monopoly value."
Western Mail - Friday 17 September 1948, page 1.And finally, that bastard Labour government wanted to protect the working conditions and wages of pub staff:


"There had been difficulties during the year concerning the Catering Wages Act, which treated licensed houses and hotels as factories and demanded a 48-hour week for catering staffs. It meant increased expenditure, but the employees generally were satisfied with the former system."
Western Mail - Friday 17 September 1948, page 1.
The lazy gits, just working 48 hours a week. See, they'd never complained before about worse conditions. They must have been happy to work 72-hour weeks.



More... (http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2020/06/post-war-legislation-and-brewer.html)