PDA

View Full Version : The Pub Curmudgeon - Standing at the crossroads



Blog Tracker
15-09-2017, 10:17
Visit The Pub Curmudgeon site (http://pubcurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2017/09/standing-at-crossroads.html)



https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-mxdKyjPHX6o/WbuF4RvLS3I/AAAAAAAAF5c/AxCL5ffKt6k3d3STydllRUT_Dh1UFAyDgCLcBGAs/s200/crossroads_pubs.jpg (https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-mxdKyjPHX6o/WbuF4RvLS3I/AAAAAAAAF5c/AxCL5ffKt6k3d3STydllRUT_Dh1UFAyDgCLcBGAs/s1600/crossroads_pubs.jpg)
Outgoing Good Beer Guide editor Roger Protz has called for CAMRA to embrace craft keg beers (https://www.morningadvertiser.co.uk/Article/2017/09/11/Roger-Protz-CAMRA-must-embrace-craft-keg-beer) to ensure its survival into the future. It is certainly a widely expressed view that CAMRA needs to widen its original remit and, in effect “modernise or die”.
However, this raises a number of questions. The first is exactly what he means by “embrace”. It is one thing to accept that many beers that fall outside the definition of “real ale” have considerable merit, and few except a handful of diehards in CAMRA would disagree. The organisation should certainly be a lot more relaxed about praising non-“real” beers and ciders in an official context.
But to actually bring quality craft keg beers within CAMRA’s campaigning remit is something else entirely. For a start, how do you define them? Some people have suggested that you don’t really need to, and you know what is good and what is not. But you can’t seriously campaign for anything on such a woolly basis. “Real ale”, for better or worse, does have a clear-cut definition. There may be a bit of fuzziness around the edges, but broadly speaking you know what is real ale and what isn’t. Nobody can say the same about “quality keg”.
A further point is that real ale can be made by companies of any size, and indeed the old Big Six brewed some of the best real ales in the country. But, true to his Trotskyite past, there’s a lot in Protz’s interview about the threat from the giant multinational brewers, and indeed the official US definition of “craft beer” sets an (admittedly large) limit on company size. However, a beer doesn’t metamorphose overnight from good to bad purely through a change of ownership, and drinkers are unlikely to be impressed by someone judging beers on company size rather than intrinsic merit.
Closer to home, BrewDog have become a very big fish in a small craft pond, and must now exceed the production volumes of the likes of Greene King and Marston’s. Does that mean their beers no longer qualify as craft? And if they do, how about “craft” beers such as East Coast IPA and Shipyard from the established brewers?
Keg beers from the likes of Beavertown and Magic Rock are undoubtedly craft, but how about if Taylors produced a keg version of their highly-acclaimed Landlord? If that is approved, then surely that is accepting precisely what CAMRA was originally set up to fight. And if it isn’t, on what objective basis does it differ from the beers from the obvious crafties? And does that mean that cask Landlord should no longer be accepted as a quality beer either?
Maybe, of course, this is what quality craft keg needs:
We need a certification process to label it; Certified Authentic Craft Keg. Only support it if it carries the CACK mark 😁
— Serious Brewing Co (@SeriousBrewCo) September 11, 2017 (https://twitter.com/SeriousBrewCo/status/907332348362010625) There are no easy answers to these questions, but they are not things that can be airily dismissed with a breezy “you know it when you see it”. The risk is that you end up with a campaign just for “beers we happen to approve of”, which would not exactly possess much credibility. Plus there remains a lingering suspicion of a hidden agenda to cut adrift many well-known cask beers on the grounds that they commit such cardinal sins as being “popular” and “easy-drinking”.
It also has to be questioned whether the development of “beer enthusiasm” since the early days of CAMRA should be regarded as a straightforward onwards-and-upwards process. As I wrote here (http://pubcurmudgeon.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/beer-from-somewhere-or-from-anywhere.html), in the beginning it was essentially a preservationist movement, seeking to defend a valued tradition that was seen as under threat. Over the years, however, it has grown and metamorphosed into something that would have been completely unrecognisable at the start.
It is entirely reasonable that many people are somewhat uneasy about this and feel that it has moved into territory where they really don’t want to go. It is not wrong, or stick-in-the-mud, it is just a different way of looking at things. You can’t expect everyone to be interested in everything (http://pubcurmudgeon.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/a-taste-of-tradition.html), and just because some people aren’t attracted by something as a leisure interest doesn’t mean they disapprove of it. “Hey, I got into architecture to preserve mediaeval churches. I never thought I’d be expected to enthuse over all this weird modernist stuff”.
Plus, as Boak & Bailey have said (http://boakandbailey.com/2017/06/the-craft-beer-life-on-a-budget/#comment-74731), the British craft beer movement “rejected not only ‘mass-produced’ beer but also the trappings of established ‘real ale’ culture.” Given this, it isn’t surprising that there is a certain reluctance to embrace it. It’s sometimes argued that this is basically a generational divide that will be eroded by the passage of time, but that’s akin to the common fallacy that conservative political values will fade away as older people die off. In practice, it doesn’t happen, as each generation rediscovers them anew.
The result is to end up with two camps of traditionalists and modernists who are divided more by mutual incomprehension than dislike as such. On the one hand there are enamel-stripping DIPAs and gleaming, uncomfortable craft emporia, on the other, boring twiggy brown bitter and gloomy old man pubs. Each side just doesn’t get what the other sees in it.
A case could be made for splitting CAMRA into two separate organisations – one that concentrates on the preservation of a distinctive British tradition, the other that wholeheartedly embraces the world of modern beer innovation. There would be no reason why somebody couldn’t be a member of both – they are not mutually exclusive, just different.
In practice, though, it’s unlikely to happen as, rather like the present-day Labour Party, the risk of striking out on your own is too great, so uneasy bedfellows stay together. But, while some may claim to straddle both sides, it’s hard to deny that most people who have an interest in beer and pubs at heart identify with one camp or the other. I can think of very few whom I know either through personal acquaintance or as bloggers that I would struggle to place. No doubt in the end some kind of uneasy compromise will be arranged, but the underlying tension is not going to go away.
As an aside, later in the article old Protzy is still wittering on about “unfair competition from supermarkets”, which basically, as I explained here (http://pubcurmudgeon.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/the-undercutting-fallacy.html), is nonsense. The UK has some of the most expensive off-trade alcohol in the EU, and still has one of the highest proportions of beer consumed in the on-trade. And, realistically, there’s nothing you can do about it anyway.


More... (http://pubcurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2017/09/standing-at-crossroads.html)