PDA

View Full Version : Shut up about Barclay Perkins - Adnams beers in 1914



Blog Tracker
08-02-2015, 07:20
Visit the Shut up about Barclay Perkins site (http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2015/02/adnams-beers-in-1914.html)


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ty5xpyZQJU0/VNNziI-v23I/AAAAAAAAWfk/WQX3HSAnocU/s1600/Adnams_Pale_Chanpion_Ale.jpg (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ty5xpyZQJU0/VNNziI-v23I/AAAAAAAAWfk/WQX3HSAnocU/s1600/Adnams_Pale_Chanpion_Ale.jpg)
We’re moving on to 1914 in our death march across the frozen tundra of Adnams brewing records. I very important year in the history of British brewing.

What’s even better, most of the beers we’ll be looking at were brewed in August, just when WW I was breaking out. British beer would never be the same again. Though for the first couple of years, higher taxes excepted, it was very much business as usual. Unlike in WW II, when the impact was almost immediate.

Confession time: I’m pretty sure at least one beer is missing, PA. It was in the 1913 logs and I can’t imagine it had been discontinued. But I know that it wasn’t brewed very often, probably the least often of all their beers. I assume that I’ve just missed it.

One other point. I had been going to say that I’d noticed these cryptic little entries in the racking part of the record. Then I saw what they were. I thought they were doing the magically conjuring up different beers at racking time thing. But it’s actually quite simple and comprehensible. They were creating XXXX by blending XX and Tally Ho. Something similar happened with BLB, which was transformed into PA.

Here are example entries:


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-3LigHinDnSk/VNN0kqeaQ5I/AAAAAAAAWfs/mwZK7FPlHU0/s1600/Adnams_BLB_to_PA.jpg (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-3LigHinDnSk/VNN0kqeaQ5I/AAAAAAAAWfs/mwZK7FPlHU0/s1600/Adnams_BLB_to_PA.jpg)

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-aNTf1rz4U8g/VNN0kh1dcwI/AAAAAAAAWfw/gp4VtTQkeA8/s1600/Adnams_XX_to_XXXX.jpg (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-aNTf1rz4U8g/VNN0kh1dcwI/AAAAAAAAWfw/gp4VtTQkeA8/s1600/Adnams_XX_to_XXXX.jpg)

The XXXX blend has an effective OG of about 1049º and the PA blend 1048º.

I suppose it’s time for a table. First the most important specs:



Adnams beers in 1914


Date
Beer
Style
OG
FG
ABV
App. Atten-uation
lbs hops/ qtr
hops lb/brl
dry hops (oz / brl)
Pitch temp
max. fermen-tation temp
length of fermen-tation (days)


6th Aug
BLB
Pale Ale
1044
1007
4.89
84.09%
7.00
1.34
10.55
60º
69.25º
7


11th Aug
BS
Stout
1055
1013.5
5.49
75.45%
5.86
1.43
0
60º
67.75º
7


22nd Dec
DS
Stout
1065
1016.6
6.40
74.43%
6.97
2.11
3.97
60º
69.5º
8


5th Aug
Tally Ho
Old Ale
1082
1029.5
6.95
64.02%
5.92
2.21
11.94
60.25º
72º
7


11th Aug
X
Mild Ale
1033
1005.5
3.64
83.33%
4.38
0.58
0
60º
66.25º
8


7th Aug
XX
Mild Ale
1042
1008
4.50
80.95%
4.20
0.73
0
60º
69.5º
7


Source:


Adnams brewing records.



It’s an odd range of beers in some ways. Way more Tally Ho was brewed than I would have expected. It must have sold quite well, even taking into account some was used for blending. In fact it’s the second most brewed beer after XX (which was getting on for half of the brews).

At the other end of the scale there’s X, a totally puny beer for the period. I’m shocked to see something that weak. XX is pretty weak, too. Only the XXXX blend is approaching the gravity of a London X Ale. If I think of BS as really being a Porter, it’s gravity makes more sense. While DS is about right for a base level Stout.

BLB looks like a classic Light Bitter with a gravity in the mid-1040’s. But hopped pretty decently, especially in terms of dry hops. More than half a pound per barrel is a lot. Four ounces would be more typical for a beer of this gravity.

The attenuation of some of the beers is very high. In fact, only Tally Ho has a rather low degree of attenuation.

Compare and contrast time, again using Whitbread:



Whitbread beers in 1914


Date
Beer
Style
OG
FG
ABV
App. Atten-uation
lbs hops/ qtr
hops lb/brl
Pitch temp


6th Oct
X
Mild
1055.1
1017
5.04
69.16%
5.95
1.35
60º


24th Jun
2PA
Pale Ale
1054.2
1019
4.65
64.91%
9.00
2.10
58.5º


8th Oct
FA
Pale Ale
1048.5
1015
4.43
69.06%
9.84
2.07
58.5º


7th Oct
PA
Pale Ale
1061.1
1021
5.31
65.63%
8.91
2.39
58.5º


6th Oct
IPA
IPA
1049.9
1015
4.61
69.92%
10.97
2.39
58.5º


6th Nov
KK
Stock Ale
1072.7
1024
6.44
66.99%
11.02
3.41
57º


6th Nov
2KKK
Stock Ale
1078.0
1026
6.88
66.66%
11.02
3.66
57º


6th Nov
KKK
Stock Ale
1082.0
1028
7.14
65.85%
11.02
3.85
57º


30th Apr
P
Porter
1053.0
1016
4.89
69.79%
5.55
1.21
61º


10th Aug
Exp S
Stout
1065.4
1012
7.06
81.64%
13.01
3.94
57º


30th Apr
LS
Stout
1054.7
1016
5.12
70.74%
5.55
1.25
61º


1st Apr
SS
Stout
1081.9
1022
7.93
73.15%
8.23
2.94
57º


19th Aug
SSS
Stout
1096.1
1035
8.09
63.59%
8.45
3.52
57º


Sources:


Whitbread brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numbers LMA/4453/D/01/079, LMA/4453/D/01/080, LMA/4453/D/09/108 and LMA/4453/D/09/1094.


You can see that the hopping was heavier in London: 5.5 lbs per quarter for Porter and weak Stout, 6lbs for AX Ale, 8lbs for strong Stouts, 9lbs for Pale Ales, 11 lbs for Stock Ales. While at Adnams BLB and DS were the most heavily hopped at just 7 lbs per quarter. The mild Ales had just over 4 lbs per quarter.

Whitbread’s one Mild is stronger than even Adnams XXXX. While all their Pale Ales are stronger than even Adnams PA blend. Only Tally Ho, as strong as Whitbread’s strongest Stock Ale is really up to scratch.

Next time we’ll be looking at the grists.

More... (http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2015/02/adnams-beers-in-1914.html)