PDA

View Full Version : Shut up about Barclay Perkins - League table of London Pale Ales in the 1920's



Blog Tracker
20-07-2014, 08:14
Visit the Shut up about Barclay Perkins site (http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2014/07/league-table-of-london-pale-ales-in.html)


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-FoT8I5Oi48o/U8Z9qeAxmfI/AAAAAAAAUFU/Snykf07aTcM/s1600/Courage_Alton_IPA_1950.jpg (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-FoT8I5Oi48o/U8Z9qeAxmfI/AAAAAAAAUFU/Snykf07aTcM/s1600/Courage_Alton_IPA_1950.jpg)
I may have processed the final individual Pale Ale, but I'm not quite done. A review of results is in order.

I'll warn you now: it's going to be table overload. I can't help playing around with the numbers and presenting them in different ways. I think we can learn much from them, especially the overall numbers for each type of beer.

The good news is that the majority of average scores per brewery were positive. The two negative average score - for Cannon and Charrington - were only very slightly below zero. I'm not sure how significant it is that both are Ordinary Bitters.

This first table demonstrates one point very clearly: that the beers of each type were very similar in their specifications across the different breweries. The Best Bitters in particular have virtually identical gravities. I think this is partly as a result of the price/gravity controls which were in place in the years after WW I. And also just commercial reality. Because so much of the price was solely the tax, there was little room for flexibility. Tax made up about 40% of the retail price in the 1920s.

Let's start with the league table based on average score. Once again, Whitbread are the champions:




League table of 1920s London Pale Ales by score


Brewery
FG
OG
ABV
App. Atten-uation
score


Whitbread
1011.3
1046.0
4.51
75.55%
2.25


Truman
1008.0
1047.5
5.14
83.09%
1.62


City of London
1008.7
1045.5
4.79
80.82%
1.00


Huggins
1008.7
1046.0
4.86
81.10%
0.36


Meux
1007.4
1044.8
4.87
83.36%
0.33


Barclay Perkins
1008.7
1045.6
4.81
80.88%
0.25


Wenlock
1006.9
1044.5
4.90
84.56%
0.09


Hoare
1012.1
1046.3
4.44
73.83%
0.00


Lion Brewery
1010.7
1046.5
4.65
77.05%
0.00


Cannon
1009.0
1045.2
4.72
80.06%
-0.09


Charrington
1008.7
1048.2
5.14
81.91%
-0.09


Average 8d
1009.1
1046.0
4.80
80.20%
0.52


Watney
1011.4
1053.8
5.54
78.90%
2.21


Courage
1012.0
1053.8
5.46
77.93%
1.25


Mann
1008.3
1053.4
5.88
84.44%
0.07


Benskin
1010.1
1053.6
5.68
81.23%
0.00


Average 9d
1010.4
1053.7
5.64
80.63%
0.88


Source:


Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001



I'm struck by the high degree of attenuation. For both Ordinary and Best Bitter it's over 80%.
Overall the standard is pretty high, at least in terms of score. let's see how they do for clarity:




League table of 1920s London Pale Ales by clarity


Brewery
No. examples
no. bright
% bright
no. good flavour
% good flavour


Truman
13
11
84.62%
12
92.31%


Whitbread
4
3
75.00%
4
100.00%


Watney
14
9
64.29%
14
100.00%


Wenlock
11
7
63.64%
6
54.55%


Cannon
11
6
54.55%
6
54.55%


Huggins
11
6
54.55%
7
63.64%


Barclay Perkins
12
6
50.00%
7
58.33%


Courage
12
6
50.00%
8
66.67%


Hoare
10
5
50.00%
4
40.00%


Lion Brewery
10
5
50.00%
6
60.00%


Meux
12
5
41.67%
9
75.00%


City of London
13
5
38.46%
10
76.92%


Mann
14
5
35.71%
7
50.00%


Benskin
9
3
33.33%
4
44.44%


Charrington
11
3
27.27%
5
45.45%


Average
167
85
50.90%
109
65.27%


Source:


Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001



Just ever so slightly over half being fully bright is poor. Only Whitbread and Truman scored really well on this point. And as for Charrington - pathetic. Barely a quarter of their samples were clear. You can see that there's not a direct relationship between clarity and flavour quality. City of London is a good example. Not much more than a third clear, but three-quarters with a good flavour. Whoever would have thought I'd be able to check something like this almost 100 years later?

There are some impressive performances in terms of flavour:



League table of 1920s London Pale Ales by % good flavour


Brewery
No. examples
no. bright
% bright
no. good flavour
% good flavour


Whitbread
4
3
75.00%
4
100.00%


Watney
14
9
64.29%
14
100.00%


Truman
13
11
84.62%
12
92.31%


City of London
13
5
38.46%
10
76.92%


Meux
12
5
41.67%
9
75.00%


Courage
12
6
50.00%
8
66.67%


Huggins
11
6
54.55%
7
63.64%


Lion Brewery
10
5
50.00%
6
60.00%


Barclay Perkins
12
6
50.00%
7
58.33%


Wenlock
11
7
63.64%
6
54.55%


Cannon
11
6
54.55%
6
54.55%


Mann
14
5
35.71%
7
50.00%


Charrington
11
3
27.27%
5
45.45%


Benskin
9
3
33.33%
4
44.44%


Hoare
10
5
50.00%
4
40.00%


Average
167
85
50.90%
109
65.27%


Source:


Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001



Whitbread, Watney and Truman all do very well, the first two with perfect scores, the other pretty close. I must admit surprise at Charrington's piss poor performance. They're a brewery that had a good reputation, yet they're stumbling along at the bottom end of the tables.

Now it's time to compare the statistics of the beer types we've looked at so far. In all, there are almost 500 samples:




Averages per beer type


beer type
No. examples
no. bright
% bright
no. good flavour
% good flavour
average score


Burton Average
138
61
44.20%
92
66.67%
0.72


Mild Average
188
112
59.57%
112
59.57%
0.16


X Average
170
104
61.18%
106
62.35%
0.23


MA Average
18
8
44.44%
6
33.33%
-0.18


PA Average
167
85
50.90%
109
65.27%
0.62


8d PA Average
118
62
52.54%
76
64.41%
0.52


9d PA Average
49
23
46.94%
33
67.35%
0.88


Average
493
258
52.33%
313
63.49%
0.57


Source:


Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001



Burton Ale comes out on top for score. As long as we lump all the Pale Ales together. Split out Best and Ordinary Bitter and Best Bitter wins. Surprisingly, Burton scores worst for clarity. Elsewhere, Mild is bottom for everything. Splitting out X Ale and MA improves things a bit for the former. Other than for clarity, a general rule seems to be the higher the gravity, the better chance of a good pint.

Finally a ranking by brewery. The number is the position in the relevant league table.




Ranking by brewery


Brewery
Burton
Mild
PA
Total


Whitbread
1
4
1
6


Watney
8
2
2
12


Courage
2
8
4
14


Mann
3
1
10
14


Truman
9
6
3
18


Wenlock
6
3
9
18


Meux
4
11
7
22


Lion
7
7
12
26


Huggins
11
10
6
27


Hoare
10
9
11
30


Cannon
14
5
14
33


City of London
12
17
5
34


Barclay Perkins
13
15
8
36


Charrington
5
16
15
36



You know what's really spooky about that result? The top five - Whitbread, Watney, Courage, Mann and Truman - were, if I remember correctly, the last five large breweries in London. Most of the bottom half are breweries that disappeared before WW II. With the exception of the two relegation positions. I'm very surprised - and disappointed - to see Barclay Perkins and Charrington propping up the table.

It looks as if, in general, the better the quality of your beer, the better your chances of long-term survival. Either that or the larger the brewery, the better the beer quality.

Finally done with Pale Ale. Next it's the turn of Porter.

More... (http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2014/07/league-table-of-london-pale-ales-in.html)