PDA

View Full Version : Shut up about Barclay Perkins - Cannon Brewery Burton Ale quality 1922 - 1924



Blog Tracker
15-02-2014, 08:47
Visit the Shut up about Barclay Perkins site (http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2014/02/cannon-brewery-burton-ale-quality-1922.html)

It's the same drill as last week, just with dogy Burton replacing dodgy Mild.

Would I expect Burton to be in better condition than Mild? It's hard to say. Being stronger and more heavily hopped, you'd think Burton would have had a longer shelf-life. On the other hand, Mild sold a lot more. I suppose we're going to find out over the next week. My money is on Burton.

I'll start with a random newspaper article mentioning the brewery.



http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-aBVBrQxKHi0/UvTBzBjg5_I/AAAAAAAAS_M/ihO6runPyXc/s1600/London_Nags_Head_Hackney_Road.jpg (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-aBVBrQxKHi0/UvTBzBjg5_I/AAAAAAAAS_M/ihO6runPyXc/s1600/London_Nags_Head_Hackney_Road.jpg)


The former Nag's Head




"LOAN CLUB VICTIMS.
MAGISTRATE AND BREWERS.
Arthur James Barrett, (42), a licensed victualler, of Hackney-road, Bethnal Green, E., was charged remand at Old-street police Court with converting to his own use £581 belonging to the Nag's Head Mutual Loan Club.

The magistrate (Mr. Clarke Hall,) said that he had received two heartrending letters from unfortunate people who had lost their money which they had paid into the club that they might have a happy Christmas.

Mr. W. G. Jenkins, prosecuting, said that the amount involved was £1,095.

Mr. H. V. R. Hayne, who appeared for the Cannon Brewery Company, said that such clubs were run independently of the brewery company, who had no control of any sort over them. They did not know anything about the rules of the club that the banking was to be done with the company.

Mr. Clarke Hall said that for six years the brewery had allowed their name to appear on the rules, and that influenced people in putting their money into the club.

Mr. Hayne said they had not seen the rules.

Mr. Clarke Hall said there was moral responsibility on the brewery company, but he had experience of the great generosity brewers and he thought this was a case in which the company might come forward.

An further remand in custody was ordered."
Gloucester Citizen - Friday 13 December 1929, page 5.The magistrate is clearly hinting that the brewery should reimburse those who had been defrauded.

The Nag's Head was at 324 Hackney Road and closed in 1991*.

Funnily enough, the Nag's Head was virtually opposite a brewery:

West's brewery Co. Ltd.
313/315 Hackney Road,
Bethnal Green E2.

West's was bought by Hoare in 1929 with 60 pubs**.



http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xqtlBeRi54A/UvTDBUbDydI/AAAAAAAAS_U/xFcJp4QWzg4/s1600/Wests_Brewery_Hackney_Road_large_scale_OS_1896.jpg (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xqtlBeRi54A/UvTDBUbDydI/AAAAAAAAS_U/xFcJp4QWzg4/s1600/Wests_Brewery_Hackney_Road_large_scale_OS_1896.jpg )


Nag's Head and West's Brewery in 1896


Right. On with Cannon's Burton. In terms of specs, it's straight down the middle: OG in the low 1050's, about 5% ABV, 75% attenuation.

Now onto beer quality. Only five of eleven were clear. That's not very good. But better than flavour, where only three have positive scores. And there are four scores of -2 or less. It's all very disappointing. Especially as Cannon got a decent score, 0.54, for its Mild Ale.

What was the cause of their Burton being in such poor condition? It's very hard to say from this distance. But, as their Mild scored reasonably well, it probably wasn't the beer itself where the problem lay. More likely it was how quickly - or how slowly - it sold.




Cannon Brewery Burton Ale quality 1922 - 1924


Year
Beer
FG
OG
ABV
App. Atten-uation
Appearance
Flavour
score


1922
KK
1011
1052
5.34
78.85%
fairly bright
fair
1


1922
KK
1015
1054.4
5.06
71.69%
not bright no head
v poor
-2


1922
KK
1015
1053.3
5.00
72.23%
v bright
v fair
2


1922
KK
1015
1053.3
5.00
72.23%
bright
mawkish
-1


1923
KK
1015
1053.5
5.00
71.96%
brilliant
good
2


1923
KK
1011
1054.9
5.72
79.96%
juicy
too new
-1


1923
KK
1013
1052.6
5.20
76.05%
hazy
v poor
-2


1923
KK
1013
1051.7
5.00
74.47%
bright
poor palate
-1


1923
KK
1014
1053.4
5.06
73.03%
not bright
Poor & thin
-1


1924
KK
1012
1051.3
5.15
77.19%
hazy
going off
-2


1924
KK
1013
1050.4
4.90
74.80%
brilliant
gone off
-3


Average
1013
1052.8
5.13
74.77%


-0.73


Source:


Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001



Next time it's the turn of Charrington, whose Mild was rather disappointing.



* http://pubshistory.com/LondonPubs/BethnalGreen/NagsHead.shtml
** "A Century of British Breweries Plus" by Norman Barber, 2005, page 86.

More... (http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2014/02/cannon-brewery-burton-ale-quality-1922.html)