PDA

View Full Version : Shut up about Barclay Perkins - City of London Brewery Mild Ale quality 1922 - 1923



Blog Tracker
01-02-2014, 07:06
Visit the Shut up about Barclay Perkins site (http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2014/02/city-of-london-brewery-mild-ale-quality.html)


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-tSrdsc-JnD8/UuDf5oo3YqI/AAAAAAAAS6E/4voNGzphLgE/s1600/Hoare_Golden_Dinner_Ale.jpg (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-tSrdsc-JnD8/UuDf5oo3YqI/AAAAAAAAS6E/4voNGzphLgE/s1600/Hoare_Golden_Dinner_Ale.jpg)
Predicting the future is a dangerous game. If I could do it, I wouldn't be pissing around writing this blog. Actually, I probably would. Just in a mansion. Typing on a solid gold keyboard.

The City of London Brewery, located on the river at Upper Thames Street right next to Cannon Street station, was one of the oldest in London, dating back to the 15th century. In the 18th century, under the name of Calvert & Co., it was one of the big Porter breweries. Though it's really difficult to work out sometimes which Calvert brewery is being referred to.

Now here's something confusing. According to "A Century of British Breweries Plus" (by Norman Barber, 2005, page 81) the brewery closed in 1922 and production was transferred to the Swan Brewery in Fulham, home of Stansfield & Co, whom City of London had bought in 1914. I guess at least the examples from 1923, and possibly some or all from 1922, were brewed there.

I wasn't lying when I said that I hadn't gone through all the breweries. When I wrote about Charrington, that was as far as I'd got. I'm talking about brewery rankings, if you've forgotten. I said that Charrington was the brewery to beat. I was so wrong.



City of London Brewery Mild Ale quality 1922 - 1923


Year
Beer
FG
OG
ABV
App. Atten-uation
Appearance
Flavour
Score


1922
X
1005
1033.6
3.71
84.82%
thick
sour
-3


1922
X
1005
1034.2
3.84
86.26%
cloudy
fair
1


1922
X
1005
1034.2
3.77
84.80%
almost bright
poor & thin
-2


1922
X
1006
1034
3.64
82.35%
bright
poor
-1


1922
X
1007
1033.7
3.51
80.12%
hazy
not quite sound
-1


1923
X
1007
1031
3.11
77.42%
not quite bright
casky
-2


1923
X
1007
1033.3
3.37
78.08%
bright
fair
1


1923
X
1007
1034.7
3.57
79.25%
grey
poor, going off
-2


1923
X
1006
1035.2
3.77
82.39%
bright
unpleasant flavour
-3


1923
X
1007
1035.6
3.77
81.46%
fairly bright
harsh
-2


1923
X
1007
1031
3.11
77.42%
not quite bright
casky
-2


1923
X
1007
1033.3
3.37
78.08%
bright
fair
1



Average





-1.25


Source:


Whitbread Gravity book held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document number LMA/4453/D/02/001



They really seem to have had cloudiness issues in London. Only 4 of 12 properly bright. Was that why Mild got darker - to mask problems with clarity? Or did the landlords have no effing clue?

The flavour is even worse. Nothing better than fair. And only three of those. "Casky" means a woody taste, I suppose. Note that these are on the weak side for 1920's X Ale. I'd expect something over 1040.

This really is the one to beat. Or can someone top it?

Look, I have to excite up this stuff. Who gives a toss about whose Mild was drinkable in 1920's London. I've learned from reality TV that an element of suspense and competition keeps the punters punting.

More... (http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2014/02/city-of-london-brewery-mild-ale-quality.html)