Blog Tracker
13-08-2013, 08:40
Visit the Shut up about Barclay Perkins site (http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2013/08/whitbread-output-by-type-1837-1839.html)
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-h1HxRRDqW4Q/UgNb20A5L1I/AAAAAAAARl4/c1OoRumcpgk/s400/Whitbread_London_Cooper.jpg (http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-h1HxRRDqW4Q/UgNb20A5L1I/AAAAAAAARl4/c1OoRumcpgk/s1600/Whitbread_London_Cooper.jpg)
One of the dead useful features of Whitbread's brewing records are the tables at the back recording the amount of each beer brewed each week. Along with nice annual totals. It means that I know exactly how much of each beer Whitbread brewed for pretty much every year between 1835 and 1940, when they annoyingly dropped the tables.
It's allowed me to track the arc of Porter's decline in the second half of the 19th century and the seemingly unstoppable rise of Mild Ale. But nothing lasts forever. Not even little joys. I feel cheated that, because of Whitbread discontinuing the table, I couldn't pin down exactly when Mild Ale started to spiral into decline.
The table below shows a very different situation, when Porter was still ascendant, especially in London. I think it's important to demonstrate that, although the London Porter brewers turned their hands to Ale in the 1830's, it was just a tiny part of their business.
The vast majority of Whitbread's output - over 80% - was Porter. Sadly, they didn't differentiate between P (Mild Porter) and K (Keeping Porter) in the table. (KXX, KXXX and KXXXX are also lumped in with XX, XXX and XXXX, respectively.) That would have been fascinating to see. Especially what the proportion was of each at different dates.
It's revealing how little Stout Whitbread brewed. Well under 10,000 barrels a year. Pretty much from the outset, they brewed more X Ale than all the Stouts combined. This set the trend for the later 19th century, where almost all Whitbread's output was either Porter or X Ale. It was only in the mid 1890's, when their Pale Ales started to gain popularity, that the combined share of Porter and X Ale fell below 75-80%.
Here's my table:
Whitbread output by type 1837 - 1839
1837
1838
1839
beer
barrels brewed
%age of total
barrels brewed
%age of total
barrels brewed
%age of total
X
8,702
4.88%
16,057
8.85%
17,787
9.27%
XL
999
0.52%
XX
3,319
1.86%
4,570
2.52%
4,750
2.47%
XXX
3,070
1.72%
4,315
2.38%
5,596
2.92%
XXXX
483
541
0.28%
Total Ale
15,091
8.46%
25,425
14.01%
29,673
15.46%
P
157,005
87.99%
147,206
81.11%
154,857
80.68%
S
4,329
2.43%
6,857
3.78%
6,266
3.26%
SS
1,894
1.16%
1,819
1.17%
502
0.31%
SSS
119
0.07%
183
0.10%
637
0.33%
Total Porter
163,347
91.54%
156,065
85.99%
162,262
84.54%
Total Ale & Porter
178,438
181,490
191,935
Source:
Whitbread brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numbers LMA/4453/D/01/001, LMA/4453/D/01/002 and LMA/4453/D/01/003 .
More... (http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2013/08/whitbread-output-by-type-1837-1839.html)
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-h1HxRRDqW4Q/UgNb20A5L1I/AAAAAAAARl4/c1OoRumcpgk/s400/Whitbread_London_Cooper.jpg (http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-h1HxRRDqW4Q/UgNb20A5L1I/AAAAAAAARl4/c1OoRumcpgk/s1600/Whitbread_London_Cooper.jpg)
One of the dead useful features of Whitbread's brewing records are the tables at the back recording the amount of each beer brewed each week. Along with nice annual totals. It means that I know exactly how much of each beer Whitbread brewed for pretty much every year between 1835 and 1940, when they annoyingly dropped the tables.
It's allowed me to track the arc of Porter's decline in the second half of the 19th century and the seemingly unstoppable rise of Mild Ale. But nothing lasts forever. Not even little joys. I feel cheated that, because of Whitbread discontinuing the table, I couldn't pin down exactly when Mild Ale started to spiral into decline.
The table below shows a very different situation, when Porter was still ascendant, especially in London. I think it's important to demonstrate that, although the London Porter brewers turned their hands to Ale in the 1830's, it was just a tiny part of their business.
The vast majority of Whitbread's output - over 80% - was Porter. Sadly, they didn't differentiate between P (Mild Porter) and K (Keeping Porter) in the table. (KXX, KXXX and KXXXX are also lumped in with XX, XXX and XXXX, respectively.) That would have been fascinating to see. Especially what the proportion was of each at different dates.
It's revealing how little Stout Whitbread brewed. Well under 10,000 barrels a year. Pretty much from the outset, they brewed more X Ale than all the Stouts combined. This set the trend for the later 19th century, where almost all Whitbread's output was either Porter or X Ale. It was only in the mid 1890's, when their Pale Ales started to gain popularity, that the combined share of Porter and X Ale fell below 75-80%.
Here's my table:
Whitbread output by type 1837 - 1839
1837
1838
1839
beer
barrels brewed
%age of total
barrels brewed
%age of total
barrels brewed
%age of total
X
8,702
4.88%
16,057
8.85%
17,787
9.27%
XL
999
0.52%
XX
3,319
1.86%
4,570
2.52%
4,750
2.47%
XXX
3,070
1.72%
4,315
2.38%
5,596
2.92%
XXXX
483
541
0.28%
Total Ale
15,091
8.46%
25,425
14.01%
29,673
15.46%
P
157,005
87.99%
147,206
81.11%
154,857
80.68%
S
4,329
2.43%
6,857
3.78%
6,266
3.26%
SS
1,894
1.16%
1,819
1.17%
502
0.31%
SSS
119
0.07%
183
0.10%
637
0.33%
Total Porter
163,347
91.54%
156,065
85.99%
162,262
84.54%
Total Ale & Porter
178,438
181,490
191,935
Source:
Whitbread brewing records held at the London Metropolitan Archives, document numbers LMA/4453/D/01/001, LMA/4453/D/01/002 and LMA/4453/D/01/003 .
More... (http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2013/08/whitbread-output-by-type-1837-1839.html)